DENVER (CBS4) – Proposition 112, the initiative requiring greater oil and gas setbacks for new development projects, has been rejected by Colorado voters.

It was rejected by a margin of 57 percent to 42 percent.

Proposition 112 would have banned drilling within 2,500 feet of occupied buildings and vulnerable areas like schools and parks on non-federal land. However, the sites that are already in operation would have been grandfathered in to the current rule of 500 to 1,000 feet.

proposition 112 Voters Reject Proposition 112 Which Would Have Limited Oil & Gas Development

(credit: CBS)

Opponents of 112 believed the limitations that would have come with the measure would have devastated the state’s economy.

mayors on 112 sc raw 01 concatenated 130946 frame 174 Voters Reject Proposition 112 Which Would Have Limited Oil & Gas Development

(credit: CBS)

“So what we have under this measure is a 2,500 foot setback and you draw a circle around that and it becomes a mile across. Then pretty soon you’ve got concentric circles across the state which takes out 94 percent of the private land in the top five oil and gas producing counties in Colorado, effectively a ban on our industry,” said opponent Dan Haley in a CBS4/CPT12 debate in September.

PHOTO GALLERY: Election Day In Colorado 2018

Supporters said the measure would have put public safety first.

drilling request rush 12vo frame 143 Voters Reject Proposition 112 Which Would Have Limited Oil & Gas Development

(credit: CBS)

“I think there’s a lot of times, too, that people don’t realize that people who collected these signatures, people who signed this ballot initiative, are teachers, are school board members. They are people who would supposedly benefit from the severance taxes. But then we have schools that are — we have three schools doing emergency evacuation drills. So at what point do we say that money trumps health and safety. So we say no,” said Heidi Henkel, a 112 supporter.

ELECTION RESULTS: See The Complete Colorado 2018 General Election Results

Tens of millions of dollars were spent on ads against the ballot measure this year. That included an ad that featured former state leaders Republican Bill Owens and Democrat Ken Salazar.

Comments
  1. Ed Bentley says:

    Only in America would they allow blatant lies to be used in advertising to defeat this important bill. I’m sure nobody who voted really understood what the bill was about. If you listened to any of the ads by the Petroleum Council you would have thought this was a school funding bill? Shameful but what would you expect in a country that allows it’s citizens to be slaughtered daily in the streets with guns and do nothing about it. Money always “Trumps” any common sense laws.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s